Western civilization owes much of its success to Christian principles and institutions, and schools should teach students about these influences as part of a rigorous social studies curriculum.
The real reason the Bible is not generally accepted is because the perception is that it's connected mainly to religion and theology. In order to bring back the relevancy of biblical teachings and concepts we have to revive courses such as 'Western Civilization' and 'Civics' in academia and mainstream elementary education.
If people recognize that there is 'value' and meaning to perceived life forms, something is happening that is prior to newspapers or printing. How could such understanding of insights be shared with the human tribe? There ought to be a serious review for the future inheritors of our 'civilization' that something is manifest or surprisingly self-evident. Let us study civics. "People have rights;" who says such a thing?
Clueless Response or Calculated Evil? Which is it?
Western Civilization is based on our shared Judeo-Christian heritage. Out of that heritage comes Christianity. Out of that Heritage comes the idea that people have rights. flowing from that is the idea of traditional democracy, which is limited government, capitalism, the middle class, and their morals and values. Science and Medicine arose in Western Civilization.
Anything else and you are dealing with Eastern Civilization or Southern (hemisphere) civilization, which have none of those.
I keep reiterating this: we are based on JudeoChristian civilization. Leaving out the Judeo part is simply wrong. Everyone should read both the Torah (Old Testament) and the New Testament. They’re very interesting! It’s part of a basic education.
I completely agree. It has to be Judeo-Christian. Western Civilization ethics and legal system come from the Judaic tradition. Leaving this out leaves out the foundation of all.
All true Christians read and respect the Old Testament, without which the New Testament can have no meaning. (I would also argue that the Old Testament has no ongoing relevance but for the New, but that's another story.)
The 'Judeo-' omission isn't necessarily wrong or antisemitic. Instead I would argue that the Christian faith is inherently an amalgamation of both, Old and New Testaments. So the prefix seems like an unnecessary redundancy.
Yes, “Judeo-Christian” is the better term and I’m thankful you stated why so well. I think the term is in need of revival from the last half century of non-use. It’s vital to our understanding of American values.
I thank Jenna Robinson for writing this article. We need more of this type of writing and thinking & understanding. Unfortunately too many young people do not read anymore and have virtually no knowledge of how western civilization evolved. Hence they have no concept of why morals and ethics, if they even know what these are. Nor do they understand these are vital to our existence of evolving from being savages to modern humans. The reason they have no knowledge of such is the educational system’s ignoring these concepts. Think of what the teachers unions believe and act on besides their pay and pensions.
I agree that biblical literacy is indispensable for understanding Western civilization, but I’d want the curriculum to be careful on two fronts. First, “teaching the Bible” is not the same as state-sponsored devotional instruction. The Bible can and should be taught historically, literarily, and contextually. Second, Christians especially should remember that the Old Testament was not originally written “to Christians” in any direct historical sense. It was Israel’s Scriptures, produced in an ancient Near Eastern context, and the New Testament’s claims about Jesus only make sense when that context is taken seriously. So yes: teach the Bible. But teach it honestly—as Hebrew Scripture, Second Temple Jewish context, Christian Scripture, and a massive force in Western law, literature, art, and moral imagination.
.don't disagree that our version of 'western civilization' was and continues to be shaped by our collective 'judeo-christian heritage', but do disagree with the premise that this means we should continue to cling to ancient, created to manage their circumstances, 'religious prescriptions and proscriptions - it's 2026, not 2713BCE, and not 733CE.
.y'all wanna start with your (learned) version of faith-based stories, unable to use your god-given intelligence and reason to see that judaism was an incredibly successful combo of spiritual, cultural, and governance 'rules and regs' created in a time of pagan tribal ignorance and 'god-ordered' human sacrifice etc, which evolved over a few thousand years to become much more logical and humanistic etc, then was the roots of the earliest form(s) of christianity - which in turn both 'evolved' and 'fossilized' into diverse rigid, patriarchal, and paternalistic 'systems' of governance (for both state and individual spiritual needs) - then came another desert 'prophet' who united many tribes and clans and sects of his era into a formidable political-religious movement based on the stories and beliefs (from judaism and christianity) which were by then being widely shared by illiterate desert-dwelling nomads who had for centuries developed their ideas of divinely-ordained 'rules and regs' for living communally.
.then for all the reasons that generations of theological historians have opined about, three 'groups' / three 'sets of beliefs', all purportedly 'devotees' of the same 'one and only god', the one and only Creator, continue into a 'downward spiral' of conflict and anguish and hate over who is right and who is wrong, who are the 'true believers', who were or are 'god's favorite' people, 'god's chosen people'. etc.
.imo, it is so immensely counter-productive to believe that any religion that radically changed / evolved over many centuries should now be held 'frozen' in time, with adherents needing to 'cling' to dogma as it was a few centuries ago.
.ftr, i do not believe in the 'holy trinity', i do not believe that the prophet 'muhammad' was 'god's final prophet' ever, and i do not believe that "god/allah/yahweh/thegreat sprit" CHOSE, 2727 years ago, to favour forever and ever one small group / tribe of 'pagan' peepls, and all their direct and indirect descendents, over and above" and "forever and ever" all other humans yet to be born. (peace/shalom/salaam/othr):)
We do not need to cling to dogma or fossilized belief. Frozen is a not-very-lively mental/physical state. What 'happened' before 'me' or my parents is open to heart thumping interest. Then, 'what happens next?' is a current aspiration.
Karen, I couldn't agree more. Also, a curriculum that respects our secular society needs to be arrived at by consensus. Tom Holland is partisan, and a bad example. To extract those Biblical notions that actually permeated our American documents and life regardless of credo is crucial. It's not a bad idea to study the Founding Fathers themselves, the French Revolution and the Enlightenment to get at American foundations. Yes, the Fathers were Christians, but some like Jefferson were sceptical in many ways. The Bibles, Hebrew and Christian, are slippery slopes, with infinite self contradicting scholarship.
Careful with religion. It's subjective and there's much ignorance and bias in it, besides passions that don't correspond to the objective appreciation of governance and civic ideals.
Sadly, I must disagree. Not to minimize its importance but The Bible is one book among many. To understand Civilization, which is a very big word, one must take on a serious study of the History of Civilizations. All the books, all the religions, all the political ups and downs. It's a very big subject.
How terribly depressing it is to watch a mind that once fought so bravely against the suffocating shackles of one theocracy flee straight into the arms of another. To hear you argue that "teaching civilization means teaching the Bible" is to witness a profound failure of nerve, a capitulation to the very transactional, utilitarian view of truth that you once so rightly despised.
Let us be completely clear about what is happening here. You have not looked upon the cosmos, weighed the evidence, and suddenly found the narrative of a virgin birth or a resurrected Galilean to be historically persuasive. By your own admission, this is a political conversion, a tactical retreat. You look at the very real threats facing the West, the resurgence of authoritarianism, the totalizing grip of Islamism, and the intellectual rot of modern "wokeness", and you conclude that secular liberalism is too weak a shield. You want a fortress, and you think the church provides one.
But to embrace a myth because you think it is useful is the ultimate form of intellectual cynicism. It is to say that the common people cannot be trusted with the truth; that they must be fed a diet of celestial rewards and hellfire to keep them marching in defense of the realm.
And what a bizarre misreading of history it is to claim that the Bible is the sole engine of Western civilization. Which Bible shall we teach? The one that explicitly sanctions chattel slavery? The one that demands the stoning of adulterers and blasphemers? The one that tells us that the rulers of this world are instituted by God and must not be resisted?
If the West is a civilization worth defending, it is precisely because it managed, through centuries of bloody, exhausting struggle, to emancipate itself from the absolute authority of that very book. The virtues you wish to protect, freedom of expression, scientific inquiry, the rights of women, individual conscience, were not gifted to us by the Church. They were wrung from its white-knuckled grasp by the heretics, the skeptics, and the infidels of the Enlightenment.
You are asking us to fight the dogmatism of the East by resurrecting the dogmatism of the West. But a civilization that can only be saved by a collective pretense, by a hollow, instrumentalized faith adopted as a geopolitical armor, is a civilization that has already surrendered its soul. We do not need to teach the Bible as divine truth to understand our past; we need to teach our children how to think critically so they can survive it.
Do not trade the hard-won light of reason for the comforting twilight of the sanctuary. We expected better of you
” Europe’ has Never been an identity. Anglos were mostly just groups of Confused, water-hat”ng, Rat & jigger infe”ted Vikings who’s infer”or”ty complex has always made them have the psychotic Need to prove that they’re more than just a Neanderthal error in the Evolution of MAN.”
ROMANS = BARBARIANS who created WAR CULTURE.
“Everything happening in America & WORLD is designed to benefit Europe, directly or indirectly, WORLD POLITICS & RELIGION ARE JUST THEATRICS”.
Certain groups (WHITES OF EUROPE & ISLAMISTS of Middle East) have normalized this idea that everyone must collectively take responsibility, regardless of actual involvement. So, FUCK WORLD WARS, FUCK HOLOCAUST, FUCK PALESTINE & FINAL FUCK goes to CIRCUMCISED GANGS (JUDAISM, Christianity, Islam).
4.4 billion creatures, comprising over 50% of the global population follow DESERT CULTS/CIRCUMCISED GANGS/Middle Eastern THINGS (JUDAISM=Source of Abrahamic cults, Christianity=Cheap copy of judaism, Islam=Judaism planted on Arab pagan culture) abuse vulnerable (WOMEN & CHILDREN). 𝑺𝒐, 𝒘𝒉𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒇𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒐𝒘, 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒕’𝒔 “𝑴𝒀𝑻𝑯𝑰𝑪𝑨𝑳 𝑽𝑰𝑹𝑮𝑰𝑵 𝑭𝑼𝑪”𝑬𝑹 𝒁𝑶𝑴𝑩𝑰𝑬 𝑱𝑬𝑺𝑼𝑺 𝑪𝑯𝑹𝑰𝑺𝑻” 𝒐𝒓 𝑹𝑨𝑷”𝑺𝑻 𝘼𝙍𝘼𝘽 𝑴𝑼𝑯𝑨𝑴𝑴𝑨𝑫 𝒐𝒓 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑪𝑶”𝑲 𝒊𝒏 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑹𝑬𝑪𝑻𝑼𝑴 & 𝒘𝒂𝒊𝒕 𝒇𝒐𝒓 “𝑶𝒍𝒂𝒎 𝑯𝒂-𝑩𝒂” 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒚, 𝒋𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒆𝒔 𝒂𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒆.
Take Genesis chapter 34, as an example, in which the 12 brothers and sister Dina conspired and convinced the men of Shekem to be circumcised, then when at a disadvantage, the brothers killed all the men in a scene of gross barbarity which to this day is used as a guide of moral conduct and an exemplar of “Right Conduct” by the Freemasons, a wholly Jewish construct whose god is found in Genesis 33 as El-El-O-Eh-Israel. Today in the news in London, two Iranians were arrested for allegedly spying on the Jewish community; perhaps there ought to be an investigation into the Freemasons not only spying on gentiles but in breaking businesses, denying justice, committing fraud etc. https://youtu.be/nmfwYjar2tU
Trouble is, the church omits the unfavourable truths. Take Genesis chapter 34, as an example, in which the 12 brothers and sister Dina conspired and convinced the men of Shekem to be circumcised, then when at a disadvantage, the brothers killed all the men in a scene of gross barbarity which to this day is used as a guide of moral conduct and an exemplar of “Right Conduct” by the Freemasons, a wholly Jewish construct whose god is found in Genesis 33 as El-El-O-Eh-Israel. Today in the news in London, two Iranians were arrested for allegedly spying on the Jewish community; perhaps there ought to be an investigation into the Freemasons not only spying on gentiles but in breaking businesses, denying justice, committing fraud etc. https://youtu.be/nmfwYjar2tU
If we also teach the mistakes of organized Christianity we can equip students with an understanding of how organizations go off the rails, and the communication patterns of corporate deception.. consider behaviour of the mediaeval church, or corrupt pastors in modern times.
Like the Christian bible itself, Western Civilization’s origins are rooted in the Torah and Jewish tradition. Stop with the mission to erase and replace the Jews. It’s dishonest.
The real reason the Bible is not generally accepted is because the perception is that it's connected mainly to religion and theology. In order to bring back the relevancy of biblical teachings and concepts we have to revive courses such as 'Western Civilization' and 'Civics' in academia and mainstream elementary education.
If people recognize that there is 'value' and meaning to perceived life forms, something is happening that is prior to newspapers or printing. How could such understanding of insights be shared with the human tribe? There ought to be a serious review for the future inheritors of our 'civilization' that something is manifest or surprisingly self-evident. Let us study civics. "People have rights;" who says such a thing?
Clueless Response or Calculated Evil? Which is it?
Western Civilization is based on our shared Judeo-Christian heritage. Out of that heritage comes Christianity. Out of that Heritage comes the idea that people have rights. flowing from that is the idea of traditional democracy, which is limited government, capitalism, the middle class, and their morals and values. Science and Medicine arose in Western Civilization.
Anything else and you are dealing with Eastern Civilization or Southern (hemisphere) civilization, which have none of those.
I keep reiterating this: we are based on JudeoChristian civilization. Leaving out the Judeo part is simply wrong. Everyone should read both the Torah (Old Testament) and the New Testament. They’re very interesting! It’s part of a basic education.
I completely agree. It has to be Judeo-Christian. Western Civilization ethics and legal system come from the Judaic tradition. Leaving this out leaves out the foundation of all.
All true Christians read and respect the Old Testament, without which the New Testament can have no meaning. (I would also argue that the Old Testament has no ongoing relevance but for the New, but that's another story.)
Another story indeed. We’ll agree to disagree on that!
I am glad you admit you are Wrong.
The 'Judeo-' omission isn't necessarily wrong or antisemitic. Instead I would argue that the Christian faith is inherently an amalgamation of both, Old and New Testaments. So the prefix seems like an unnecessary redundancy.
Not actually theologically correct. But I would suggest that we keep in mind the main purpose here and NOT go down the theological rabbit hole.
I agree and I just wrote that directly above.
Yes, “Judeo-Christian” is the better term and I’m thankful you stated why so well. I think the term is in need of revival from the last half century of non-use. It’s vital to our understanding of American values.
I thank Jenna Robinson for writing this article. We need more of this type of writing and thinking & understanding. Unfortunately too many young people do not read anymore and have virtually no knowledge of how western civilization evolved. Hence they have no concept of why morals and ethics, if they even know what these are. Nor do they understand these are vital to our existence of evolving from being savages to modern humans. The reason they have no knowledge of such is the educational system’s ignoring these concepts. Think of what the teachers unions believe and act on besides their pay and pensions.
An Anthropology professor at my university told the class to read the Bible because without knowing what's in it, we could not understand the US
I agree that biblical literacy is indispensable for understanding Western civilization, but I’d want the curriculum to be careful on two fronts. First, “teaching the Bible” is not the same as state-sponsored devotional instruction. The Bible can and should be taught historically, literarily, and contextually. Second, Christians especially should remember that the Old Testament was not originally written “to Christians” in any direct historical sense. It was Israel’s Scriptures, produced in an ancient Near Eastern context, and the New Testament’s claims about Jesus only make sense when that context is taken seriously. So yes: teach the Bible. But teach it honestly—as Hebrew Scripture, Second Temple Jewish context, Christian Scripture, and a massive force in Western law, literature, art, and moral imagination.
.don't disagree that our version of 'western civilization' was and continues to be shaped by our collective 'judeo-christian heritage', but do disagree with the premise that this means we should continue to cling to ancient, created to manage their circumstances, 'religious prescriptions and proscriptions - it's 2026, not 2713BCE, and not 733CE.
.y'all wanna start with your (learned) version of faith-based stories, unable to use your god-given intelligence and reason to see that judaism was an incredibly successful combo of spiritual, cultural, and governance 'rules and regs' created in a time of pagan tribal ignorance and 'god-ordered' human sacrifice etc, which evolved over a few thousand years to become much more logical and humanistic etc, then was the roots of the earliest form(s) of christianity - which in turn both 'evolved' and 'fossilized' into diverse rigid, patriarchal, and paternalistic 'systems' of governance (for both state and individual spiritual needs) - then came another desert 'prophet' who united many tribes and clans and sects of his era into a formidable political-religious movement based on the stories and beliefs (from judaism and christianity) which were by then being widely shared by illiterate desert-dwelling nomads who had for centuries developed their ideas of divinely-ordained 'rules and regs' for living communally.
.then for all the reasons that generations of theological historians have opined about, three 'groups' / three 'sets of beliefs', all purportedly 'devotees' of the same 'one and only god', the one and only Creator, continue into a 'downward spiral' of conflict and anguish and hate over who is right and who is wrong, who are the 'true believers', who were or are 'god's favorite' people, 'god's chosen people'. etc.
.imo, it is so immensely counter-productive to believe that any religion that radically changed / evolved over many centuries should now be held 'frozen' in time, with adherents needing to 'cling' to dogma as it was a few centuries ago.
.ftr, i do not believe in the 'holy trinity', i do not believe that the prophet 'muhammad' was 'god's final prophet' ever, and i do not believe that "god/allah/yahweh/thegreat sprit" CHOSE, 2727 years ago, to favour forever and ever one small group / tribe of 'pagan' peepls, and all their direct and indirect descendents, over and above" and "forever and ever" all other humans yet to be born. (peace/shalom/salaam/othr):)
We do not need to cling to dogma or fossilized belief. Frozen is a not-very-lively mental/physical state. What 'happened' before 'me' or my parents is open to heart thumping interest. Then, 'what happens next?' is a current aspiration.
When I went to public school in the 1960s we recited the Lord's Prayer every morning.
Karen, I couldn't agree more. Also, a curriculum that respects our secular society needs to be arrived at by consensus. Tom Holland is partisan, and a bad example. To extract those Biblical notions that actually permeated our American documents and life regardless of credo is crucial. It's not a bad idea to study the Founding Fathers themselves, the French Revolution and the Enlightenment to get at American foundations. Yes, the Fathers were Christians, but some like Jefferson were sceptical in many ways. The Bibles, Hebrew and Christian, are slippery slopes, with infinite self contradicting scholarship.
Careful with religion. It's subjective and there's much ignorance and bias in it, besides passions that don't correspond to the objective appreciation of governance and civic ideals.
Sadly, I must disagree. Not to minimize its importance but The Bible is one book among many. To understand Civilization, which is a very big word, one must take on a serious study of the History of Civilizations. All the books, all the religions, all the political ups and downs. It's a very big subject.
Dear Ayaan,
How terribly depressing it is to watch a mind that once fought so bravely against the suffocating shackles of one theocracy flee straight into the arms of another. To hear you argue that "teaching civilization means teaching the Bible" is to witness a profound failure of nerve, a capitulation to the very transactional, utilitarian view of truth that you once so rightly despised.
Let us be completely clear about what is happening here. You have not looked upon the cosmos, weighed the evidence, and suddenly found the narrative of a virgin birth or a resurrected Galilean to be historically persuasive. By your own admission, this is a political conversion, a tactical retreat. You look at the very real threats facing the West, the resurgence of authoritarianism, the totalizing grip of Islamism, and the intellectual rot of modern "wokeness", and you conclude that secular liberalism is too weak a shield. You want a fortress, and you think the church provides one.
But to embrace a myth because you think it is useful is the ultimate form of intellectual cynicism. It is to say that the common people cannot be trusted with the truth; that they must be fed a diet of celestial rewards and hellfire to keep them marching in defense of the realm.
And what a bizarre misreading of history it is to claim that the Bible is the sole engine of Western civilization. Which Bible shall we teach? The one that explicitly sanctions chattel slavery? The one that demands the stoning of adulterers and blasphemers? The one that tells us that the rulers of this world are instituted by God and must not be resisted?
If the West is a civilization worth defending, it is precisely because it managed, through centuries of bloody, exhausting struggle, to emancipate itself from the absolute authority of that very book. The virtues you wish to protect, freedom of expression, scientific inquiry, the rights of women, individual conscience, were not gifted to us by the Church. They were wrung from its white-knuckled grasp by the heretics, the skeptics, and the infidels of the Enlightenment.
You are asking us to fight the dogmatism of the East by resurrecting the dogmatism of the West. But a civilization that can only be saved by a collective pretense, by a hollow, instrumentalized faith adopted as a geopolitical armor, is a civilization that has already surrendered its soul. We do not need to teach the Bible as divine truth to understand our past; we need to teach our children how to think critically so they can survive it.
Do not trade the hard-won light of reason for the comforting twilight of the sanctuary. We expected better of you
” Europe’ has Never been an identity. Anglos were mostly just groups of Confused, water-hat”ng, Rat & jigger infe”ted Vikings who’s infer”or”ty complex has always made them have the psychotic Need to prove that they’re more than just a Neanderthal error in the Evolution of MAN.”
ROMANS = BARBARIANS who created WAR CULTURE.
“Everything happening in America & WORLD is designed to benefit Europe, directly or indirectly, WORLD POLITICS & RELIGION ARE JUST THEATRICS”.
𝙒𝙀𝙎𝙏😂😂😂😂, 𝙉𝙤 𝙤𝙣𝙚, 𝙄 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙣𝙤 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝘼𝙎𝙄𝘼 𝙨𝙖𝙮𝙨 𝙩𝙤𝙙𝙖𝙮 𝙨𝙪𝙣 𝙞𝙨 𝙨𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜, 𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙨 𝙗𝙡𝙤𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙜, 𝙄 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙣𝙤 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙜𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙨 𝙖 𝙁𝙐”𝙆. 𝙅𝘼𝙋𝘼𝙉 𝙞𝙨 𝙅𝙖𝙥𝙖𝙣, 𝘾𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙖 𝙞𝙨 𝘾𝙃𝙄𝙉𝘼. 𝙄 𝙢𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙙𝙞𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙙 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙗𝙖𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙤𝙣 “𝙎𝙆𝙄𝙉 𝘾𝙊𝙇𝙊𝙍”. 𝙔𝙚𝙨, 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩’𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙡 𝙬𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚.
ASIA (SOME DUDE from FROZE LANDS NAMED IT)
WEST = Where WHITES lives.
𝗭𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁.
𝙄𝙎𝙇𝘼𝙈 (𝙄𝙉𝘽𝙍𝙀𝙀𝘿𝙄𝙉𝙂 𝘾𝙐𝙇𝙏) 𝙄𝙎 𝘾𝙐𝙍𝙎𝙀 𝙊𝙉 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙋𝙇𝘼𝙉𝙀𝙏.
𝐈𝐟 𝐙𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐌 (𝐉𝐄𝐖ISH Perpetrators) 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐖𝐄𝐒𝐓/EUROPE, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐰𝐡𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐁𝐎𝐌𝐁 𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭 𝐄𝐔𝐑𝐎𝐏𝐄. 𝐉𝐄𝐖𝐒 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐒𝐎𝐔𝐑𝐂𝐄 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐡𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐬 & 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝.
𝐙𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐌 𝐨𝐫 𝐉𝐄𝐖𝐒 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐢𝐝𝐝𝐥𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐖𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐍 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬. 𝐀𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝 & 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐦𝐢𝐝𝐝𝐥𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐭, 𝐙𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐓 𝐂𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐀𝐋𝐒 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐀𝐒𝐈𝐀.
𝐋𝐢𝐤𝐞 “𝐏𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐈 𝐆𝐑𝐎𝐎𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐆𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐒” 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐬 “𝐋𝐎𝐕𝐄 𝐉𝐈𝐇𝐀𝐀𝐃”. 𝐈𝐧 “𝐋𝐎𝐕𝐄 𝐉𝐈𝐇𝐀𝐀𝐃” 𝐈𝐒𝐋𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐒 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐦 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐠 𝐠𝐢𝐫𝐥 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐞𝐱𝐮𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐭 𝐛𝐲 𝐦𝐮𝐥𝐭𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐋𝐈𝐌 𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐬, 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐠𝐢𝐫𝐥 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐫𝐞𝐧. 𝐍𝐄𝐂𝐑𝐑𝐎𝐏𝐇𝐈𝐋𝐈𝐀 𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐨𝐧 𝐢n 𝐏𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐍.
IMTIAZ Mahmood = 𝙒𝙄𝙏𝙃𝙊𝙐𝙏 𝙇𝙐𝙎𝙏 𝙄𝙎𝙇𝘼𝙈 𝙄𝙎 𝘿𝙐𝙎𝙏.
ARABS don’t give a FU”K about ISLAM or Muhammad. Mecca is cash cow for them.
𝐋𝐈𝐁𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐋𝐈𝐌𝐒: 𝐀𝐥-𝐓𝐚𝐪𝐢𝐲𝐲𝐚𝐡 (𝐨𝐫 𝐓𝐚𝐪𝐢𝐲𝐲𝐚) 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐩𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐬 𝐚 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐟𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐡, 𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐟𝐬, 𝐨𝐫 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐟𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐡𝐢𝐝𝐝𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐚 (𝐉𝐈𝐇𝐀𝐃).
Certain groups (WHITES OF EUROPE & ISLAMISTS of Middle East) have normalized this idea that everyone must collectively take responsibility, regardless of actual involvement. So, FUCK WORLD WARS, FUCK HOLOCAUST, FUCK PALESTINE & FINAL FUCK goes to CIRCUMCISED GANGS (JUDAISM, Christianity, Islam).
4.4 billion creatures, comprising over 50% of the global population follow DESERT CULTS/CIRCUMCISED GANGS/Middle Eastern THINGS (JUDAISM=Source of Abrahamic cults, Christianity=Cheap copy of judaism, Islam=Judaism planted on Arab pagan culture) abuse vulnerable (WOMEN & CHILDREN). 𝑺𝒐, 𝒘𝒉𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒇𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒐𝒘, 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒕’𝒔 “𝑴𝒀𝑻𝑯𝑰𝑪𝑨𝑳 𝑽𝑰𝑹𝑮𝑰𝑵 𝑭𝑼𝑪”𝑬𝑹 𝒁𝑶𝑴𝑩𝑰𝑬 𝑱𝑬𝑺𝑼𝑺 𝑪𝑯𝑹𝑰𝑺𝑻” 𝒐𝒓 𝑹𝑨𝑷”𝑺𝑻 𝘼𝙍𝘼𝘽 𝑴𝑼𝑯𝑨𝑴𝑴𝑨𝑫 𝒐𝒓 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑪𝑶”𝑲 𝒊𝒏 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝑹𝑬𝑪𝑻𝑼𝑴 & 𝒘𝒂𝒊𝒕 𝒇𝒐𝒓 “𝑶𝒍𝒂𝒎 𝑯𝒂-𝑩𝒂” 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒚, 𝒋𝒖𝒔𝒕 𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒎𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒆𝒔 𝒂𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒆.
Take Genesis chapter 34, as an example, in which the 12 brothers and sister Dina conspired and convinced the men of Shekem to be circumcised, then when at a disadvantage, the brothers killed all the men in a scene of gross barbarity which to this day is used as a guide of moral conduct and an exemplar of “Right Conduct” by the Freemasons, a wholly Jewish construct whose god is found in Genesis 33 as El-El-O-Eh-Israel. Today in the news in London, two Iranians were arrested for allegedly spying on the Jewish community; perhaps there ought to be an investigation into the Freemasons not only spying on gentiles but in breaking businesses, denying justice, committing fraud etc. https://youtu.be/nmfwYjar2tU
Trouble is, the church omits the unfavourable truths. Take Genesis chapter 34, as an example, in which the 12 brothers and sister Dina conspired and convinced the men of Shekem to be circumcised, then when at a disadvantage, the brothers killed all the men in a scene of gross barbarity which to this day is used as a guide of moral conduct and an exemplar of “Right Conduct” by the Freemasons, a wholly Jewish construct whose god is found in Genesis 33 as El-El-O-Eh-Israel. Today in the news in London, two Iranians were arrested for allegedly spying on the Jewish community; perhaps there ought to be an investigation into the Freemasons not only spying on gentiles but in breaking businesses, denying justice, committing fraud etc. https://youtu.be/nmfwYjar2tU
If we also teach the mistakes of organized Christianity we can equip students with an understanding of how organizations go off the rails, and the communication patterns of corporate deception.. consider behaviour of the mediaeval church, or corrupt pastors in modern times.
Like the Christian bible itself, Western Civilization’s origins are rooted in the Torah and Jewish tradition. Stop with the mission to erase and replace the Jews. It’s dishonest.
Civilisation - a society made up of cities.
Nothing to do with ethics or morality.